Case Analysis of the U.S. Army Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program

Bradley Stinger Fighting Vehicle - Enhanced Weapon System

Publisher: Storming Media

Written in English
Published: Downloads: 793
Share This

Subjects:

  • BUS041000
The Physical Object
FormatSpiral-bound
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL11851732M
ISBN 101423574796
ISBN 109781423574798

  The U.S. Army remains at war and faces rapid shifts in technology. Further, as the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command paper “ The Operational Environment and the Changing Character of Future Warfare ” points out, together with the rest of domestic and international society, the Army faces the huge and ongoing tectonic shifts caused by. Army officer Douglas Macgregor wrote "Breaking the Phalanx" as far back as , but ten years on, his work looks amazingly prescient in predicting the course of transformation undertaken by the U.S. military and especially the U.S. Army since "Breaking the Phalanx" does a superb job of capturing the essentials of the discussion within Reviews: Force (USAF) model is pilot-based, but the U.S. Army also operates UAS equipped with sensors and weapons. JASDF consider theshould USAF as a model operate the and. The Sublime: The Paradox of the 7th Warfighting Function (Or why SOF cannot eat our function and have it too) Grant M. Martin. Special Operations Forces (SOF) have a problem: in order to be more effective in the “human domain” we have to paradoxically dump the concept.

This case study investigates one aspect of Army Transformation, accelerated fielding, to determine whether the Army’s materiel fielding program properly supports rapidly fielding of essential. The U.S. Army Center of Military History served as the executive of this acquisition reform study was written by Walton S. Moody and David G. Allen for their draft Volume III (–) of the Commission on Army Acquisition and Program Management in Expeditionary Operations. Every Soldier a Cyber Warrior: The Case for Cyber Education in the United States Army Ap — Cyberspace represents a new domain of warfare unlike any other in military history. Cyberwarfare practitioners be they state actors, non-state actors or individual hackers, are capable of tremendous–and readily deniable–damage to an. Develop warfighting concepts appropriate to emerging challenges in synch with “The U.S. Army Operating Concept” Improve surface transportation and defense logistics to meet wartime challenges Employ concepts of operations that provide the context for analytical decision-making.

You are about to proceed to an external website. The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the Department of Defense (DoD), the United States Army, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), Cyber Center of Excellence (CCoE), U.S. Army Cyber School, U.S. Army Signal School and Fort Gordon of the linked websites or the information, products or services . Lt. Gen. William Phillips, director of the Army Acquisition Corps, rejected the charge that the entire Army acquisition process was "broken," citing the rapid development and fielding of a number of new systems, including the MRAP and M-ATV armored vehicles in response to the deadly IED threat in Iraq and Afghanistan. U.S. Army War College March Volume A View of Command, Control, Communications and Computer Architectures at the Dawn of Network Centric Warfare By Kevin J. Cogan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. —Alan Kay, American Computer Scientist The very essence of leadership is that you have a vision.   The Army’s approach to modernization must not only meet its own needs, but also fit into a larger approach to joint warfighting. The Army’s work on the multi-domain battle concept of.

Case Analysis of the U.S. Army Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program Download PDF EPUB FB2

Case Analysis of the U.S. Army Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program: Bradley Stinger Fighting Vehicle - Enhanced Weapon System [Walter Jones] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This is a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA report procured by the Pentagon and made available for public release.

CASE ANALYSIS OF THE U.S. ARMY WARFIGHTING RAPID ACQUISITION PROGRAM: BRADLEY STINGER FIGHTING VEHICLE -­ ENHANCED WEAPON SYSTEM Author: Approved by: Walter Jones Captain, United States Army B.S., University of California, Riverside Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT from the.

With the Department of Defense's budget continuing to be reduced, Army acquisition managers must acquire superior weapon systems within shorter time periods with less resources, One effective way to accomplish this with relatively small, urgently needed acquisition programs is through the Army's Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program (WRAP).

This thesis uses a case study of the Bradley Stinger Fighting Vehicle-Enhanced (BSFV-E) air defense Author: Walter. Jones.

AN ANALYSIS OF ARMY RAPID ACQUISITION ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to determine if current regulations support a repeatable and manageable rapid acquisition process.

The methodology used to analyze the research is the knowledge value-added theory and data extrapolated from selected acquisition Size: 2MB. The Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program Needs More Specific Guidance GAO/NSIAD Army to the Committee on Armed Services, U.S.

Senate, May The Task Force XXI AWE was one. For the last decade, the U.S. Army has quickly acquired systems for war. By examining the nontraditional methods used, this study examines how the Army can improve rapid acquisition, focusing in particular on command and control systems.

ARMY ACQUISITION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT: WINNING ON THE PRESENT AND FUTURE BATTLEFIELDS Since the Goldwater-Nichols Act ofthe U.S. Army has engaged in over different deployment missions ranging from peacekeeping and counter-insurgency, to full-scale warfare.

1 During this same period, the Army Acquisition Corps (AAC) has also transitioned. Rapid Acquisitions The Rapid Acquisition Process (RAP) provides rapid transition funding for the development and fielding of highly successful competitive experiments and demonstrations.

It addresses the approach, assessment, validation, sourcing, resourcing, and fielding of operationally driven urgent, execution-year combatant commander needs. PROBLEMS WITH POLICY lOnly addresses systems acquisition - not total acquisition system lTreats evolutionary approaches and innovations as “non- traditional” excursions lEndorses “tailoring” but provides no amplifying guidance to assist acquisition strategy development lProvides no firm decision criteria Our current process Case Analysis of the U.S.

Army Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program book practices: • Take too long and cost too much. By Warfighting Function. Home Army Doctrine Organization of the Army Joint and Multinational. Experiment, Evolve and Deliver» The Army Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office serves to expedite critical capabilities to the field to meet Combatant Commanders’ needs.

The Office enables the Army to experiment, evolve and deliver technologies in real time to address both urgent and emerging threats, while supporting acquisition reform efforts. The U.S. Army has always placed tremendous emphasis on training and education.

It is a foundational part of our culture, dating back to Washington and Von Steuben training that transformed the Continental Army at Valley Forge, the founding of West Point inthe establishment of the School.

Army Warfighting Assessment informs rapid capabilities. By Vanessa Flores, U.S. Army. Fort Bliss, TX (November 7, )-- Technology worldwide is advancing at a rapid pace. Similar to upgrades on modern devices, such as smartphones or tablets, the Army must provide Soldiers upgrades to their tactical equipment -- and do it faster than the adversary.

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Army's implementation of the Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program (WRAP), focusing on the current status of the noted that: (1) the Army's criteria for selecting WRAP candidates are open-ended and allow room for different interpretations; (2) as a result, although the Army initially justified WRAP funding on the basis of the.

opment, acquisition, and life cycle manage-ment of Army materiel solutions to satisfy approved Army requirements for warf-ighting capabilities. This regulation takes precedence over other Army regulations with respect to the management of Army acquisition programs.

Statutes, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Defense Federal. Army Warfighting Challenges This document supersedes all previous versions dated – 29 JUN Army Warfighting Challenges (AWFCs) – enduring first-order problems, the solutions to which improve the combat effectiveness of the current and future force.

The Army Rapid Capabilities Office will enable the Army to experiment, evolve and deliver technologies in real time to address both urgent and emerging threats, while supporting acquisition reform. Army advances rapid acquisition for cyber defense. By Claire Heininger, U.S.

Army August 17 forward with a unique approach that will enable rapid acquisition of defensive cyber capabilities in. Acquisition professionals within the U.S.

Army must develop, test, manufacture, and procure this type of military equipment in large quantities with money allocated by the U.S. Congress (U.S. Department of Defense [DoD], b).

This process is slow, structured, hierarchal, and inefficient. The AAP performs in a manner akin to the. and Eleven Years of Working in Army Acquisition Author: Ms. Chenxi Dong-O’Malley is a member of the Competitive Development Group/Army Acquisi-tion Fellowship program of the U.S.

Army Acquisition Support Center. She is currently Force Projection and Sustainment Portfolio manager at the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineer. Through grounded experiences at the tactical level and academic study of organizational leadership theory, I seek to connect academic theory to Army doctrine and show the successes of MC in practice through a case study of the 2nd Battalion, nd Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, st Airborne Division (Air Assault).

Case analysis of the U.S. Army Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program: Bradley Stinger Fighting Vehicle - Enhanced weapon system Get this from a library. Army modernization: the Warfighting Rapid Acquisition Program needs more specific guidance: report to the chairman, National Security.

US Army Case Study Help - Case Solution & Analysis Ivey Case Study Solution. Facebook. Twitter. Google+. President must manage to acquire America (and a lot more specially the U.S. Army) to war without the guidance in the American persons, General Abrams intertwined the composition from the 3 components in the army in this type of way as.

Acquisition workforce noncommissioned officers (NCOs) are managed through military occupational specialty (MOS) 51C, contracting NCO. The U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center (USAASC) is the proponent of MOS 51C, and functions performed by the Army acquisition workforce are based in statute and cannot be performed by non-acquisition personnel.

Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation Headquarters, United States Army. Training and Doctrine Command. Fort Eustis, Virginia 28 June Force Development.

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT, CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION, AND CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION. FOR THE COMMANDER: OFFICIAL: DAVID D. HALVERSON. Lieutenant General, U.S.

Army. General William E. DePuy changed the U.S. Army. As the first commander of the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), he created the mechanisms to restore the Army’s self-image as a conventional combat force trained and configured for continental warfare.

He made it a doctrinal Army for the first time in its year history. Army Operational Framework: Organizing the Force for Battlefield Success This bulletin identifies trends for fiscal year (FY) across the combat training centers (CTCs), based on observations from observer-coach/ trainers (OC/Ts) and CALL collection and analysis teams, with support from various U.S.

Army Training and Doctrine Command Centers of. Department of the Army Washington, DC 12 June Motor Transportation-General Management, Acquisition, and Use of Motor Vehicles *Army Regulation 58–1 Effective 12 July History. This publication is a rapid action r e v i s i o n. T h e p o r t i o n s a f f e c t e d b y t h i s.

Center for the Army Profession and Leadership Case Study Packages. ☰ Menu. Case Studies» Case Study Packages. Stand Strong. Stand Strong Video Case Studies including SSG Valdez, SPC Wright, PFC Schuette, and CSM Guerra. Ethical Modules.

An Official U.S. Army Site. G-3/5/7 Operations, Plans and Training. Develop, integrate, and manage training operations and requirements, concepts, policies, plans; and directs operations continuously across TRADOC in support of CG TRADOC, ARFORGEN and the Human Capital Enterprise in order to build a campaign-capable, expeditionary and versatile Army in support of the Joint War-fighting Commander.

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE COMMAND CONTROL COMMUNICATIONS-TACTICAL // X5 PEO C3T manages 45 key acquisition pro-grams, executing more than $2 billion annual-ly, with a workforce of more than employ - ees. The organization provides operational units with radios, computers, servers, apps, and other hardware and software required for.

Ina relatively obscure book caused a major stir among the U.S. Air Force leadership. Why Air Forces Fail, edited by Robin Higham and Stephen J. Harris, lays out the determinants of failure.he U.S. Central Command Materiel Recovery Element (CMRE) had the task of ret-rograding, redistributing, and dis-posing of more t foot equivalent units (TEUs) of Army equipment that had accumulated after a decade of war in Afghanistan.

This proved to be a monumental task that showcased the U.S. military’s logis-tics strength.